Duke and Washington University academic-practitioners Eric Mlyn and Amanda Moore McBride recently penned a commentary in The Chronicle of Higher Ed, International Volunteer Service: Good Intentions are Not Enough. It's a good, balanced piece that does expose some of the best practices and inherent risks in global service-learning, but it does not demonstrate the growing community of scholars and practitioners engaged in rigorous consideration and evaluation of global service-learning. Though we don't anticipate regularly updating this site until April, we thought this was a good time to share some of these numerous emerging resources.
There is clearly a growing group of thoughtful community development practitioners and bloggers who are extremely critically of international volunteerism, but also know that it can be done well and are eager to share some approaches that have worked. Prominent in this area is Saundra Schimmelpfennig at Good Intentions are Not Enough. Saundra regularly shares excellent related resources via her Twitter feed (like this recent Participation Handbook for Humanitarian Fieldworkers) and also manages to connect with and share content from new voices, including Daniela Papi of lessonsilearned. Daniela has posted multiple times, 3, 4, 5, and more) on international volunteering done well - and is articulating a model of "learning service" rather than service-learning.
The university research community is also moving forward with significant new insights in this area, including (in the Michigan Journal - the field's most respected journal):
- Crabtree's Theoretical Foundations for International Service-Learning
- Kiely's Chameleon with a Complex: Searching for Transformation in International Service-Learning
- Keith's Community Service-Learning in the Face of Globalization: Rethinking Theory and Practice
- and Sandmann, Kiely, and Grenier's Program Planning: The Neglected Dimension of Service-Learning.